Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 740A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +394%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 740A
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2013
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.36 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GK208
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
GT 740M
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy