Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 560 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +60%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 560
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2017
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
16
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy