AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
1.962 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+25%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
30.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
61.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1.962 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
122.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
