AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385X
+9755%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Strato
GPU Name
G98
Strato XT
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
