Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M380 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M380 +17%
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
12
768
Shading Units
960
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Strato PRO
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy