Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (975MHz vs 940MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +176%
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Oct 2014
Crystal System
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Topaz
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy