AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+39%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
AD107
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
