Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +23%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
596 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net