CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+1504%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT200
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
4
AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy