Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1504%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy