Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1141%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GK208
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy