AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1680MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 A375
1.299 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+2416%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
All-In-One
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
640
Shading Units
9728
40
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
40.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1299 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Venus
GPU Name
AD103
Venus XTX
(216-0846033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.8
