Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +100%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy