Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +2420%
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
RV620
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy