AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (403.2GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 16 GB
+74%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU102
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
