AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
+1063%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV730
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
