Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV535
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
44W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy