AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon PRO W9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM Radeon PRO W9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W9070 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1206MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W9070
+47%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
180W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Polaris 20
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
