Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2260 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2260 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +8260%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro 2260 PCI
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy