AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
+64%
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
All-In-One
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
RV730
Opal XT
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1
