AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs AMD FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
+106%
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Opal XT
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0
