Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360E vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

AMD Radeon R7 360E vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +560%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net