AMD Radeon R7 360E vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+101%
3.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
195W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
GK104
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
