AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+1423%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
8192
48
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
450W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
