AMD Radeon R7 360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
+238%
1.613 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
GT200B
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
