AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+20%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
DG1
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
