AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
+97%
1.971 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV770
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
