AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+508%
12 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 260X
1476
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+451%
8147
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
AD107
Bonaire XTX
(215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
