Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (115W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +1147%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
450W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net