Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +1400%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Navi 21
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy