AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
+195%
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
Redwood
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
