AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1677%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
