AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 220 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 8.528GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 220 OEM
0.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
+358%
0.477 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
533 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
8.528GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
80
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
19W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GT200
Cedar PRO
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
