Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon X1600

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 230W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV516
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
27W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy