Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 5100 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1086MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 5100
3.892 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +173%
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

713 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1086 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

34.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
121.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
3.892 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
3.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
243.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Polaris 10 PRO GL (215-0876144)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net