AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 210W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (152.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
+5%
1.312 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
210W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GF110
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
