AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+19%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
512
Shading Units
336
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
GF114
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
