AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
+48%
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
Cayman
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
