Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1440MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +726%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GA100
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy