Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V7800P

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V7800P

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800P to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 138W)
ATI FirePro V7800P 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800P +61%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
18
512
Shading Units
1440
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cypress
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
138W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy