Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +18709%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
384
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK107
Navi 31
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy