Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +8265%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
384
384
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK107
Navi 31
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy