Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 148% (2495MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (295W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +341%
61.32 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
May 2020
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
6912
384
TMUs
432
192
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
400W
600 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy