Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +6918%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
7
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
336
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF104
Navi 31
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy