AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 19 years late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 130W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2004
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 33
GPU Name
NV43
Navi 33 XL
(215-163000057)
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
110 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
