AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 33
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 33 XL
(215-163000057)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
