AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600
+13781%
19.99 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
73W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 33
GPU Name
RV630
Navi 33 XL
(215-163000057)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
