Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2440MHz vs 1837MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 4.10GB/s)
Lower TDP (130W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (96GB vs 8GB)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600
19.99 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +210%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GB100
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
208 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

130W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy