Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2150MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +713%
22.02 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
80
RT Cores
6
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GA107
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy