Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV560
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy