AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2087MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X
+462%
16.03 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1800 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
3840
Shading Units
896
240
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
TU106
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
